Pulse
2026-09-18-v3.0
Dataset
2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset
b2e8889c66f7
Scanned
2026-10-27
Window
February–September 15, 2026
Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Aesthetic, minimalist platform for learning Japanese inspired by Duolingo and Monkeytype, built with Next.js and sponsored by Vercel. Beginner-friendly with plenty of good first issues - all contributions are welcome!

01Result

lingdojo/kana-dojo ↗

lingdojo/kana-dojo AI coding statistics: 1.3%

of 27,333 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
1.3% agent · top contributor 80.2%49 contributors
individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

354
agent commits
26,979
other considered commits
49
agent contributors
80.2%
largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

354assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Agent-attributed commit share by month
MonthAgent shareConsidered commits
2026-023.8%1933
2026-032.5%5061
2026-042.7%4139
2026-050.4%4123
2026-060%3871
2026-070.3%4241
2026-080.3%2945
2026-090.5%1020

Peak month: 3.8%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

AgentVendorCommitsShare
GitHub CopilotGitHub3051.1%
Claude CodeAnthropic350.1%
Cursor AgentAnysphere110%
DevinCognition30%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window32,128
Merge commits removed−3,042
CI / dependency bots removed−1,753
Considered27,333

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →Cursor Agent commitsBrowse repositories with detected Cursor Agent signatures →Devin commitsBrowse repositories with detected Devin signatures →TypeScript AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across TypeScript repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →
Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli lingdojo/kana-dojo

Scan another repository

Try