Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

DPI Aware mouse move across screens

01Result

mgth/LittleBigMouse ↗

mgth/LittleBigMouse AI coding statistics: 89%

of 373 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

89% agent · top contributor 74.4%3 contributors

individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

332

agent commits

other considered commits

agent contributors

74.4%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

332assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 100%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	332	89%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

3ed1d65c on GitHubfeat(lbm-agent): keep a hook running on Windows too (D5)Claude Code
5b0cf12b on GitHubdocs(v6-agent): what is left of phase 3, after this runClaude Code
f91f1b92 on GitHubfeat(lbm-agent): the one UAC consent, when it is wanted and possibleClaude Code

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	535
Merge commits removed	−162
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	373

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →C# AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across C# repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli mgth/LittleBigMouse

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-06	91.7%	12
2026-07	89.3%	214
2026-08	79.5%	83
2026-09	100%	64