Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Democratizing AI scientists with ToolUniverse

01Result

mims-harvard/ToolUniverse ↗

mims-harvard/ToolUniverse AI coding statistics: 4.5%

of 638 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

4.5% agent · top contributor 41.4%9 contributors

org-wide

Adoption is broad. Many contributors are committing agent-authored work, which is what a real organisational rollout looks like.

agent commits

609

other considered commits

agent contributors

41.4%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

29assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 12.8%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	26	4.1%
Cursor Agent	Anysphere	3	0.5%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

d6fe965f on GitHubfix(deps): declare websockets and urllib3, and audit module-scope importsClaude Code
f937203c on GitHubfix(deps): stop pointing users at `markitdown[all]` in hints and docsClaude Code
92e820b7 on GitHubfix(deps): name MarkItDown converter extras instead of `all`Claude Code
d935bc89 on GitHubfix: sync server.json version from pyproject.toml on publishCursor Agent
639ab3d6 on GitHubadd wfgy tool (#81)Cursor Agent
cc20c556 on GitHubAdd new life science API tools and fix duplicate status keysCursor Agent

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	738
Merge commits removed	−97
CI / dependency bots removed	−3
Considered	638

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →Cursor Agent commitsBrowse repositories with detected Cursor Agent signatures →Python AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Python repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli mims-harvard/ToolUniverse

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-01	0%	1
2026-02	2.8%	106
2026-03	0%	132
2026-05	0%	34
2026-06	0%	35
2026-07	2.2%	90
2026-08	9.5%	201
2026-09	12.8%	39