Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Track emissions from Compute and recommend ways to reduce their impact on the environment.

01Result

mlco2/codecarbon ↗

mlco2/codecarbon AI coding statistics: 17.3%

of 347 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

17.3% agent · top contributor 45%11 contributors

org-wide

Adoption is broad. Many contributors are committing agent-authored work, which is what a real organisational rollout looks like.

agent commits

287

other considered commits

agent contributors

45%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

55assisted

5autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 52%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	45	13%
Cursor Agent	Anysphere	9	2.6%
GitHub Copilot	GitHub	6	1.7%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

45481c4d on GitHubdata(nordic): fold SE1-SE4 into this PR and trim metadataClaude Code
9dc34151 on GitHubdata(nordic): point provenance at the Khepri v1.3 recordClaude Code
ef94235e on GitHubdata(nordic): per-zone CI for Norwegian bidding zones NO1-NO5Claude Code
3fcd4dc5 on GitHubdocs: stop presenting Threadripper 68+68=137 W as a correct RAPL sum (#140Cursor Agent
af78bb6a on GitHubfix: raise HTTP errors from ApiClient instead of returning NoneCursor Agent
3161c53c on GitHubperf: speed up CLI monitor startup and fix wrapped commands (4/4) (#1254)Cursor Agent
39de5f8f on GitHubtest: fix logger handler type assertionGitHub Copilot
241e498d on GitHubtest: add coverage for OSError/KeyError/AttributeError amdsmi import failuGitHub Copilot
ce8cee24 on GitHubInitial planGitHub Copilot

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	457
Merge commits removed	−72
CI / dependency bots removed	−38
Considered	347

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →Cursor Agent commitsBrowse repositories with detected Cursor Agent signatures →Python AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Python repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli mlco2/codecarbon

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-02	4.7%	43
2026-03	3%	101
2026-04	52%	50
2026-05	11.5%	26
2026-06	11.8%	34
2026-07	0%	10
2026-08	25.9%	54
2026-09	27.6%	29