Pulse
2026-09-18-v3.0
Dataset
2026-09-18-v3.0
Ruleset
b2e8889c66f7
Scanned
2026-09-16
Window
February–September 15, 2026
Local to this browser
nanocoai/nanoclaw ↗

nanocoai/nanoclaw AI coding statistics: 69.1%

of 1,655 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
69.1% agent · top contributor 59.3%125 contributors
team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

1,144
agent commits
511
other considered commits
125
agent contributors
59.3%
largest contributor

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

1144assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached. Across the whole index, 96% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Agent-attributed commit share by month
MonthAgent shareConsidered commits
2026-0282.5%166
2026-0376.5%200
2026-0484.6%460
2026-0565%200
2026-0689.1%129
2026-0759.5%190
2026-0835.8%257
2026-0928.3%53

Peak month: 89.1%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

AgentVendorCommitsShare
Claude CodeAnthropic114369.1%
Cursor AgentAnysphere10.1%

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

  • f4598c01 on GitHubperf(host): reconcile and drain sessions concurrently; fixed-rate deliveryClaude Code
  • 5f5cff55 on GitHubtest(webhook): allocate free ports from the kernel instead of picking themClaude Code
  • 8ef45c85 on GitHubperf(cross-session-context): bound the echo fan to the hot set, off the waClaude Code
  • 6e22abb1 on GitHubfix: replace hardcoded /Users/user fallback with os.homedir()Cursor Agent

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window2,790
Merge commits removed−821
CI / dependency bots removed−314
Considered1,655

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Pinned to a source state

This observation names the repository state, release, and detector that produced it. Use these identifiers when reproducing or citing the result.

Dataset release
2026-09-18-v3.0
Scan date
2026-09-16
Ruleset
sha256:b2e8889c66f72c18a61839f0bf1a9f77b5481ba2def044dba33c797b2f2bdcae
Canonical repository
nanocoai/nanoclaw
Default branch
main
Resolved
2026-09-16
Measurement window
February–September 15, 2026
Download observation JSONDeterministic export · same values as this page

Position among comparable repositories

The cohort uses the same release and measurement window, then narrows to the repository’s ecosystem and removes low-activity observations.

CohortJS/TS · 376 eligible repositories · at least 100 considered commits2026-09-18-v3.0 · February–September 15, 2026 · 194 of 570 ecosystem repositories excluded
Agent-commit share position98th percentile

Midrank percentile; equal shares split the tied positions.

Repository
69.1%
Cohort median
5.4%
Share rank
8 / 376
0th50th100th

Percentile = (repositories below + half of 1 tied repository) ÷ 376.

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli nanocoai/nanoclaw

Scan another repository