Pulse
2026-09-18-v3.0
Dataset
2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset
b2e8889c66f7
Scanned
2026-10-27
Window
February–September 15, 2026
Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Leetcode solutions

01Result

neetcode-gh/leetcode ↗

neetcode-gh/leetcode AI coding statistics: 9.3%

of 97 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
Too little recent activity to publish. Only 97 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.
9.3% agent · top contributor 55.6%3 contributors
individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

9
agent commits
88
other considered commits
3
agent contributors
55.6%
largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

9assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Agent-attributed commit share by month
MonthAgent shareConsidered commits
2026-020%7
2026-0325%4
2026-0418.8%16
2026-050%25
2026-060%12
2026-077.1%14
2026-0826.7%15
2026-090%4

Peak month: 26.7%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

AgentVendorCommitsShare
Claude CodeAnthropic99.3%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

  • 064d540d on GitHubfix: repair article snippets that deterministically fail on the judgeClaude Code
  • b5bb43a9 on GitHubfix(pow-x-n): JavaScript iterative solution is wrong for n = INT_MINClaude Code
  • 8e82c808 on GitHubfix: remove Go import lines from article code blocks (judge compatibility)Claude Code

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window124
Merge commits removed−27
CI / dependency bots removed−0
Considered97

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →JavaScript AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across JavaScript repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →
Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli neetcode-gh/leetcode

Scan another repository

Try