Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

MCP, CLI, Skills for searching and downloading academic papers from multiple sources like arXiv, PubMed, bioRxiv, etc.

01Result

openags/paper-search-mcp ↗

openags/paper-search-mcp AI coding statistics: 26.1%

of 46 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

Too little recent activity to publish. Only 46 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.

26.1% agent · top contributor 25%7 contributors

team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

agent commits

other considered commits

agent contributors

25%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

9assisted

3autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 54.5%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	7	15.2%
GitHub Copilot	GitHub	5	10.9%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

81e46d7e on GitHubfix: raise on Scopus API errors instead of returning empty resultsClaude Code
74e8e0d8 on GitHubfix: normalize open-ended date ranges in Scopus searchClaude Code
f50f7a65 on GitHubfeat: Add Scopus search with ScienceDirect full-text support (opt-in)Claude Code
2af19afc on GitHubPotential fix for pull request findingGitHub Copilot
c6f98a56 on GitHubHarden Web of Science citation parsingGitHub Copilot
8ccbd80a on GitHubAdd optional Web of Science connector and integration testsGitHub Copilot

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	54
Merge commits removed	−8
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	46

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →Python AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Python repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli openags/paper-search-mcp

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-03	0%	3
2026-04	54.5%	11
2026-05	18.2%	11
2026-06	50%	4
2026-07	20%	5
2026-08	14.3%	7
2026-09	0%	5