Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

A visual tool to edit HTML and Markdown files, leave comments like a Google Doc, and send feedback to your AI agent. Works inside your favorite AI harness.

01Result

petergyang/human-review ↗

petergyang/human-review AI coding statistics: 3.8%

of 52 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

Too little recent activity to publish. Only 52 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.

3.8% agent · top contributor 50%2 contributors

individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

agent commits

other considered commits

agent contributors

50%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

2assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 5.4%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	2	3.8%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

058079c5 on GitHubFix #hash-link navigation in single-file prototypes, and note-only sends (Claude Code
c58f5b4d on GitHubsetup: discount npx's own PATH entry when choosing the invocationClaude Code

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	52
Merge commits removed	−0
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	52

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →JavaScript AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across JavaScript repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli petergyang/human-review

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-07	0%	8
2026-08	5.4%	37
2026-09	0%	7