Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

The ripgrep of AI context: a zero-dependency C++23 CLI + MCP server for coding agents. Find what you want without reading the repo, then check you built what you meant — blast radius, tests-to-run, quality deltas. Signatures at 74.7% fewer bytes than bodies; every guess labelled, every loss published. Paddle out with a map.

01Result

redhat-et/ripwire ↗

redhat-et/ripwire AI coding statistics: 81.6%

of 2,306 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

81.6% agent · top contributor 71%9 contributors

team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

1,882

agent commits

424

other considered commits

agent contributors

71%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

1882assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 87.2%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	1882	81.6%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

b5657b6c on GitHubdocs(readme): one evidence summary still said 43 repositories and 69 paperClaude Code
732b8fb3 on GitHubdocs(changelog): the symlink entries carry no reporter creditClaude Code
d5e56b99 on GitHubpresent(deck): rebuild the artifacts after the slide's wording fixClaude Code

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	2,920
Merge commits removed	−614
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	2,306

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →C++ AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across C++ repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli redhat-et/ripwire

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-07	41%	39
2026-08	76.5%	1034
2026-09	87.2%	1233