Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Start your containers on demand, shut them down automatically when there's no activity. Docker, Docker Swarm Mode, Podman, Kubernetes and Proxmox LXC compatible.

01Result

sablierapp/sablier ↗

sablierapp/sablier AI coding statistics: 19.6%

of 97 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

Too little recent activity to publish. Only 97 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.

19.6% agent · top contributor 73.7%5 contributors

team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

agent commits

other considered commits

agent contributors

73.7%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

17assisted

2autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 100%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	15	15.5%
GitHub Copilot	GitHub	4	4.1%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

59fb00d1 on GitHubfix(strategy): do not wait a full refresh interval in blocking strategy (#Claude Code
e4c307ac on GitHubtest: use testing/synctest for time-based tests (#1121)Claude Code
346c0096 on GitHubtest: use httptest.NewTestServer in the webhook, metrics and proxmoxlxc teClaude Code
b60578a1 on GitHubfeat(strategy): add poke strategy (#1015)GitHub Copilot
b14ff78b on GitHubfeat: add next build tag and multi-versionned doc (#1009)GitHub Copilot
4692a09e on GitHubfeat: Proxmox VE LXC provider (#868)GitHub Copilot

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	242
Merge commits removed	−0
CI / dependency bots removed	−145
Considered	97

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →Go AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Go repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli sablierapp/sablier

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-02	0%	3
2026-03	0%	1
2026-04	0%	3
2026-05	7.1%	42
2026-06	0%	1
2026-07	3.7%	27
2026-08	50%	10
2026-09	100%	10