Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Free and Open Source Alternative to Splitwise. Share expenses with your friends and family.

01Result

spliit-app/spliit ↗

spliit-app/spliit AI coding statistics: 62.9%

of 62 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

Too little recent activity to publish. Only 62 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.

62.9% agent · top contributor 46.2%5 contributors

team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

agent commits

other considered commits

agent contributors

46.2%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

39assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 64.3%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	33	53.2%
Cursor Agent	Anysphere	6	9.7%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

5f75ec84 on GitHubPreview the even split a new expense is actually saved with (#647)Claude Code
6ed6ba3b on GitHubCreate the gh-pages branch before publishing the perf trend (#640)Claude Code
b695816d on GitHubfix: group expenses by their stored calendar day (#635)Claude Code
c6152aa1 on GitHubAdd monthly category spending visuals (v1) (#555)Cursor Agent
00691ff6 on GitHubAdd error boundaries that do not leak exception messages (#611)Cursor Agent
0bd4a570 on GitHubLoad expense participant IDs without fetching every expense (#616)Cursor Agent

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	123
Merge commits removed	−3
CI / dependency bots removed	−58
Considered	62

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →Cursor Agent commitsBrowse repositories with detected Cursor Agent signatures →TypeScript AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across TypeScript repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli spliit-app/spliit

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-08	62.5%	48
2026-09	64.3%	14