Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Port of macOS Mojave Dynamic Desktop feature to Windows

01Result

t1m0thyj/WinDynamicDesktop ↗

t1m0thyj/WinDynamicDesktop AI coding statistics: 17.1%

of 41 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

Too little recent activity to publish. Only 41 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.

17.1% agent · top contributor 71.4%3 contributors

individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

agent commits

other considered commits

agent contributors

71.4%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

6assisted

1autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 100%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	5	12.2%
GitHub Copilot	GitHub	2	4.9%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

bdf31e8e on GitHubHit test with the scale the regions were drawn atClaude Code
51823259 on GitHubFix preview controls not responding on scaled displaysClaude Code
7c26922f on GitHubReuse cached thumbnails that do not match the requested sizeClaude Code
f35c65bb on GitHubUpdate SunCalc test expectationsGitHub Copilot
d04848e2 on GitHubUse floor instead of round for scalingGitHub Copilot

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	67
Merge commits removed	−14
CI / dependency bots removed	−12
Considered	41

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →C# AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across C# repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli t1m0thyj/WinDynamicDesktop

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-03	0%	2
2026-06	0%	10
2026-07	23.1%	26
2026-08	100%	1
2026-09	0%	2