Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Linux运维监控工具，支持系统硬件信息，内存，CPU，温度，磁盘空间及IO，硬盘smart，GPU，防火墙，网络流量速率等监控，服务接口监测，大屏展示，拓扑图，端口监控，进程监控，docker监控，日志监控，文件防篡改，数据库监控，指令批量下发执行，web ssh，Linux面板(探针)，告警，SNMP监测，K8S，Redis，Nginx，Kafka，资产管理，计划任务，密码管理，工作笔记

01Result

tianshiyeben/wgcloud ↗

tianshiyeben/wgcloud AI coding statistics: 0%

of 11 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

Too little recent activity to publish. Only 11 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.

No signed agent commits found

No agent signatures were found in the last 11 considered commits. That is a real result, not a failure to measure.

It does not mean no AI was used here. A developer can use an agent and commit by hand without leaving a detectable git signature.

agent commits

other considered commits

—

agent contributors

—

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

No agent signatures were detected, so there are no agent, mode, or timing drivers to break down.

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

No matched commit samples are available for this observation.

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	11
Merge commits removed	−0
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	11

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Java AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Java repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli tianshiyeben/wgcloud

Scan another repository

Try