Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Easily generate flowcharts and diagrams from text ⿻

01Result

tone-row/flowchart-fun ↗

tone-row/flowchart-fun AI coding statistics: 79.4%

of 34 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

Too little recent activity to publish. Only 34 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.

79.4% agent · top contributor 100%1 contributor

individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

agent commits

other considered commits

agent contributors

100%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

27assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 100%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	27	79.4%
Cursor Agent	Anysphere	1	2.9%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

55a1e195 on GitHubchore: version featureClaude Code
b6d3d484 on GitHubfix: make hosted charts truly read-only without Pro access (#819)Claude Code
3a59682f on GitHubdocs: note that shared and formulaic must be built before running the app Claude Code
711971d0 on GitHubv1.64.0 (#797)Cursor Agent

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	44
Merge commits removed	−10
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	34

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →Cursor Agent commitsBrowse repositories with detected Cursor Agent signatures →TypeScript AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across TypeScript repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli tone-row/flowchart-fun

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-02	100%	6
2026-05	78.6%	14
2026-07	66.7%	6
2026-08	50%	4
2026-09	100%	4