Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

An efficient AI coding agent extendable by neovim-like Lua plugins

01Result

tontinton/maki ↗

tontinton/maki AI coding statistics: 0.2%

of 1,996 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

0.2% agent · top contributor 25%4 contributors

team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

agent commits

1,992

other considered commits

agent contributors

25%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

4assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 0.8%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	4	0.2%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

451b44a8 on GitHubfix(providers): detect vision support for Ollama modelsClaude Code
7ecc1eab on GitHubAdd missing providers to README and site provider listClaude Code
7b2c657d on GitHubfeat(tools): image tool results and view_image Lua pluginClaude Code

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	1,996
Merge commits removed	−0
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	1,996

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →Rust AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Rust repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli tontinton/maki

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-02	0%	238
2026-03	0%	563
2026-04	0.3%	295
2026-05	0%	144
2026-06	0%	163
2026-07	0.4%	225
2026-08	0.4%	241
2026-09	0.8%	127