Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

https://checkcc.org 是一个 Claude 运行环境检测与账号风险分析工具，面向正在注册 Claude 账号、订阅 Claude Pro、申请 Claude API、使用 Claude Code，或担心 Claude 封号、账号受限、订阅失败的用户。

01Result

yacuo/check-cc ↗

yacuo/check-cc AI coding statistics: 0%

of 49 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

Too little recent activity to publish. Only 49 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.

No signed agent commits found

No agent signatures were found in the last 49 considered commits. That is a real result, not a failure to measure.

It does not mean no AI was used here. A developer can use an agent and commit by hand without leaving a detectable git signature.

agent commits

other considered commits

—

agent contributors

—

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

No agent signatures were detected, so there are no agent, mode, or timing drivers to break down.

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

No matched commit samples are available for this observation.

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	51
Merge commits removed	−2
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	49

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

TypeScript AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across TypeScript repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli yacuo/check-cc

Scan another repository

Try