Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Keep tabs on your tabs. Turn your "New tabs" page into a mission control, so you can close them easily. Built for people who open too many tabs and never close them.

01Result

zarazhangrui/tab-out ↗

zarazhangrui/tab-out AI coding statistics: 81.4%

of 97 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

Too little recent activity to publish. Only 97 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.

81.4% agent · top contributor 89.9%2 contributors

individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

agent commits

other considered commits

agent contributors

89.9%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

79assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	79	81.4%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

2c9b9c5a on GitHubfeat: bento layout + custom group supportClaude Code
43eeb536 on GitHubfeat: support personal config + fix close-extras bugClaude Code
d28f6fa5 on GitHubdocs: update README and AGENTS.md for pure extension architectureClaude Code

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	97
Merge commits removed	−0
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	97

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →JavaScript AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across JavaScript repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli zarazhangrui/tab-out

Scan another repository

Try