Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

A markdown editor — and the bridge to your LLM. Local-first, MIT, ~15 MB. Bundled MCP server lets Claude Code / Codex / Cursor drive your vault directly. 14 AI providers BYOK.

01Result

zhitongblog/solomd ↗

zhitongblog/solomd AI coding statistics: 71.5%

of 840 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

71.5% agent · top contributor 33.6%17 contributors

org-wide

Adoption is broad. Many contributors are committing agent-authored work, which is what a real organisational rollout looks like.

601

agent commits

239

other considered commits

agent contributors

33.6%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

601assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 100%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	598	71.2%
OpenAI Codex	OpenAI	3	0.4%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

7ae82af3 on GitHubfix(store-submit): give each `eval` its own scope, so a collision stops loClaude Code
a79c3e33 on GitHubchore(web): the Microsoft Store fallback pin is 4.13.0Claude Code
4c0c7ace on GitHubfeat(store-submit): a layout-independent page read, because `text` emptiesClaude Code
dcb60959 on GitHubfix(windows): standardize installs on MSIOpenAI Codex
6cd8ceda on GitHubdocs(web): point all platforms to v4.11.6OpenAI Codex
0b15c627 on GitHubfix(windows): stabilize icon identity across upgradesOpenAI Codex

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	886
Merge commits removed	−46
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	840

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →OpenAI Codex commitsBrowse repositories with detected OpenAI Codex signatures →TypeScript AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across TypeScript repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli zhitongblog/solomd

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-04	49.3%	292
2026-05	88.5%	122
2026-06	78.2%	156
2026-07	77.6%	76
2026-08	79.8%	129
2026-09	100%	65