← the index
saadeghi/daisyui ↗
3.1%
of 351 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
3.1% agent · top contributor 100%1 contributor
individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

11
agent commits
340
human commits
1
agent contributors
100%
largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

11assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Feb26
Mar26
Apr26
May26
Jun26
Jul26
Aug26
Sep26

Peak month: 7.6%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Claude CodeAnthropic113.1%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

  • 38ac3d30fix(table): pin thead/tfoot as a group so multi-row headers stack (#4643).Claude Code
  • 319f6d9afix: improve tooltip in join (#4642). closes: #4618Claude Code
  • f8443be1fix: select, input, textarea, rating size modifiers in the CDN file. closeClaude Code

What was excluded

Commits in window351
Merge commits removed−0
CI / dependency bots removed−0
Considered351

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli saadeghi/daisyui

Scan another repository

Try