11.7%

of 846 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

11.7% agent · top contributor 19.2%23 contributors

org-wide

Adoption is broad. Many contributors are committing agent-authored work, which is what a real organisational rollout looks like.

agent commits

747

human commits

agent contributors

19.2%

largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

99assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Feb26

Mar26

Apr26

May26

Jun26

Jul26

Aug26

Sep26

Peak month: 25%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Claude Code	Anthropic	80	9.5%
Cursor Agent	Anysphere	22	2.6%
GitHub Copilot	GitHub	1	0.1%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

04176d54future(upload): right-click actions in assetspage (#27451)Claude Code
28b63a1bfix(upload): folder navigation resets media library list scroll and p… (#2Claude Code
32d46817fix(upload): bound the focal point fields to the crop area (#27496)Claude Code
f45233f8future(upload): fix drawer error messages (#27352)Cursor Agent
83c57f60future(upload): dismiss the bulk-actions bar while the asset drawer is opeCursor Agent
20a44e54future(upload): keep the multi-selection when acting on one row (#27335)Cursor Agent
dad55a09Restructure SECURITY.md supported versions table (#26123)GitHub Copilot

What was excluded

Commits in window	1,073
Merge commits removed	−102
CI / dependency bots removed	−125
Considered	846

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli strapi/strapi

Scan another repository

Try