Adoption is broad. Many contributors are committing agent-authored work, which is what a real organisational rollout looks like.
Assisted or autonomous
Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.
Agent share by month
Peak month: 24.1%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.
Which agents
| Claude Code | Anthropic | 48 | 9.6% |
| Cursor Agent | Anysphere | 15 | 3% |
Verify it yourself
Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.
818a83a3fix(mcp): strip API extras from listMemories entries (#1539)Claude Codeeac07004feat(web): add memory button to company brain navbar (#1468)Claude Code19e8f06cMCP Revamp (#1120) (#1380)Claude Code958ae8b6fix(deps): bump next to 16.3.3 in chatapp, sdk-playground, and memory-grapCursor Agent879ddd5cdocs: clarify customer content is never used to train models on any plan (Cursor Agent5fee2f28docs(mcp): fix grammar in ChatGPT web plugin description (#1630)Cursor Agent
What was excluded
| Commits in window | 519 |
| Merge commits removed | −7 |
| CI / dependency bots removed | −14 |
| Considered | 498 |
Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.
How this was measured
Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.
Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli supermemoryai/supermemory