17.6%

of 125 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

17.6% agent · top contributor 81.8%4 contributors

individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

agent commits

103

human commits

agent contributors

81.8%

largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

22assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Mar26

Apr26

May26

Jun26

Jul26

Aug26

Peak month: 94.4%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Claude Code

Anthropic

17.6%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

e8af80c9Scope the nested-VT rule in nextjs.md to match SKILL.mdClaude Code
73bddacfreact-view-transitions: markdown-link all cross-references; leave AGENTS.mClaude Code
f3fa45a3react-view-transitions: layout stabilization and enter-only reveal notesClaude Code

What was excluded

Commits in window	158
Merge commits removed	−33
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	125

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli vercel-labs/agent-skills

Scan another repository

Try