One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.
Assisted or autonomous
Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.
Agent share by month
Peak month: 90.8%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.
Which agents
| Claude Code | Anthropic | 516 | 72.9% |
| GitHub Copilot | GitHub | 1 | 0.1% |
Verify it yourself
Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.
f3fa6e1ddocs: make PR numbers clickable links in review-prs skillClaude Codec1fe131afix: print closing comment drafts verbatim before AskUserQuestionClaude Code25618e21docs: warn that renaming an entry can expose it to the pypi sweepClaude Code39b1476adocs(ai-agents): add OpenAI's framework for building AI agentsGitHub Copilot
What was excluded
| Commits in window | 798 |
| Merge commits removed | −87 |
| CI / dependency bots removed | −3 |
| Considered | 708 |
Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.
How this was measured
Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.
Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli vinta/awesome-python