42.9%

of 7 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

Too little recent activity to publish. Only 7 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.

42.9% agent · top contributor 100%1 contributor

individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

agent commits

human commits

agent contributors

100%

largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

3assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Feb26

Mar26

Jul26

Peak month: 100%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Claude Code

Anthropic

42.9%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

7483836fdocs: update footer linksClaude Code
ec2c56f2docs: add pireel bannerClaude Code
71151ec3ci: add AI co-author check workflowClaude Code

What was excluded

Commits in window	7
Merge commits removed	−0
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	7

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli vueComponent/ant-design-vue

Scan another repository

Try