A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.
Assisted or autonomous
Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.
Agent share by month
Peak month: 85.1%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.
Which agents
| Cursor Agent | Anysphere | 121 | 26.9% |
| Claude Code | Anthropic | 4 | 0.9% |
Verify it yourself
Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.
8c9b9fdbci: restrict release workflow permissions (#6095)Cursor Agent3cdbc773fix(addon-search): advance highlight scan by buffer match size (#5994)Cursor Agentf57b8e15Update GitHub Actions to Node 24 compatible versions (#6007)Cursor Agent8961a72dSet autocomplete="off" on the helper textarea (#6057)Claude Codeba7e775afix: move CSI fast-path into CLEAR action to eliminate non-CSI regressionClaude Code9f6c7d7cfix(addon-fit): remove redundant same-dimension guard in fit()Claude Code
What was excluded
| Commits in window | 676 |
| Merge commits removed | −211 |
| CI / dependency bots removed | −16 |
| Considered | 449 |
Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.
How this was measured
Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.
Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli xtermjs/xterm.js